US supreme court docket overturns New York handgun regulation in bitter blow to gun-control push

Home Latest Posts US supreme court docket overturns New York handgun regulation in bitter blow to gun-control push
US supreme court docket overturns New York handgun regulation in bitter blow to gun-control push
US supreme court docket overturns New York handgun regulation in bitter blow to gun-control push

<span> Photo: José Luis Magaña / AP </span>” src=”–/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNQ–/ -~B/aD0wO3c9MDthcHBpZD15dGFjaHlvbg–/″ data-src=”]/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNQ–/–~B/aD0wO3c9MDthcHBpZD15dcom/api/res/1.2/n2PyDtmCCA1KwGv7bzJbpA–~B/aD0wO3c9MDthcHBpZD15d15d.gFjafja678d945/34c/thebwaw ></div>
<p><figcaption class=Photo: Jose Luis Magana/The Associated Press

The US Supreme Court has opened the door for nearly all law-abiding Americans to carry concealed and loaded handguns in public, after a conservative majority overturned a law in New York imposing strict limits on firearms outside the home.

Related: Biden ‘deeply disappointed’ as Supreme Court expands right to carry concealed weapons

The New York governor, who is a Democrat, said the ruling was “not solely reckless, however reprehensible.” Referring to the recent mass shootings in New York and Texas, a leading progressive group called the ruling “shameful and outrageous.”

“This ruling goes towards frequent sense and the Structure and may deeply upset all of us,” said Joe Biden.

On the left, anger is growing over the court’s march to the right. Earlier this week, the court issued a ruling that attacked the separation of church and state. Once Friday, the right to abortion, guaranteed since 1973, is expected to be undermined or eliminated, and the federal government’s ability to cut emissions contributing to the climate crisis is reduced.

A New York law that repealed Thursday requires anyone who wants to carry a gun in public to prove they have a “correct trigger” to take action. The choice in New York State Rifle and Revolver Affiliation v. Bruen makes the regulation an unconstitutional violation of the Second Modification to the fitting to bear arms.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his ruling: “Apart from a few overseas jurisdictions in the late nineteenth century, American governments have not widely prohibited the carrying of commonly used firearms for personal defense. Nor have they generally required responsible law-abiding citizens to show” A special need for self-protection that can be distinguished from that of the general community “to carry arms in public”.

Thomas wrote that New York law also violated the Fourteenth Amendment, which made Second Amendment rights apply to states.

Biden noted the longevity of New York’s gun laws and the Supreme Court’s past acceptance of the need to regulate gun ownership.

The President said: “Since 1911, the State of New York has required individuals who wish to carry a concealed weapon in public places to demonstrate the need to do so for the purpose of self-defense and to seek a license. More than a century later, the Supreme Court of the United States has chosen to overturn New York’s long-established authority to protect its citizens.

Biden added: “As late as possible [conservative] justice [Antonin] Scalia admitted, the Second Amendment is not absolute. For centuries, nations have regulated who can buy or hold weapons, the types of weapons they may use and where they can carry those weapons. Courts upheld these regulations.

“I am calling on Americans across the country to make their voices heard about gun safety. Lives are at stake.”

Biden said the ruling

Biden mentioned the ruling “contradicts frequent sense and the Structure.” Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The ruling has profound implications for the safety and behavior of up to 83 million people in New York and seven other states as well as Washington DC, with similar “acceptable trigger” laws. They include densely populated states, such as California and New Jersey, which account for nearly three out of every four Americans.

Just weeks ago, an 18-year-old with a legally purchased assault rifle murdered 10 people in a racist attack on a supermarket in a predominantly black neighborhood in Buffalo, New York.

Ten days later, another 18-year-old broke into an elementary school in Ovaldi, Texas, killing 19 children and two adults before being shot by law enforcement.

Democratic and Republican senators have since approved a framework for gun reform. On Thursday, Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, He said The proposals did not “put a single finger on the Second Modification” and would make the nation safer. However any gun laws inevitably faces sturdy headwinds, with the potential to blow up all the best way to the court docket that McConnell helped pack with conservatives.

In his opposition to the New York ruling, Stephen Breyer, a soon-to-retire liberal choose, wrote: “In 2020, 45,222 Americans were killed by firearms. Since the beginning of this year, 277 mass shootings have been reported — an average of more than one shooting per day.”

“Gun violence has now overtaken motor vehicle accidents as the leading cause of death among children and adolescents. Many states have attempted to address some of the risks of gun violence that we have just described by passing laws that limit, in various ways, who may buy, carry, or use firearms of different types.

“The Court today is overburdening the efforts of states to do so.”

Rahna Ebting, executive director of progressive group MoveOn, lamented a “shameful and outrageous decision,” adding: “The Supreme Court filled with conservatives, in concert with Republicans in Congress, ensures our schools, grocery stores, and churches continue to be targets of violence and not the havens and safe places they should be. to be “.

The court has steadily undermined gun laws, recognizing the right to keep guns at home for self-defense in 2008 and extending that right two years later.

In the New York case, two men sued the state. Under the Right Cause Act, men can obtain unlimited permission to carry concealed weapons in public only if they can demonstrate a special need for self-protection. Lawyers argued that carrying a firearm outside the home is a “fundamental constitutional right. No extraordinary act requires extraordinary proof of need.”

Civil rights and gun safety groups have attempted to influence the court. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) argued that lifting gun restrictions in public places would harm First Amendment rights such as assembly, association, and expression. Gun control advocates have warned that repealing the law could damage police-citizen relations because anyone in contact with law enforcement would be more vulnerable to legal armament.

Related: I got in the car and blindfolded. I was willing to risk death: Five women who had abortions before Ro

“The Supreme Court is taking us backwards in its handling of gun violence…This decision is not only reckless, it is reprehensible,” New York Governor Cathy Hochhol said Thursday. Hoechul too He said She was “willing to call the Legislature back into session to deal with this.”

Laetitia James, the New York attorney general, said she would not fail “to stand up to the gun lobby and their repeated efforts to endanger New Yorkers.”

Wayne LaPierre, the lead representative of this lobby, of the National Rifle Association, joined Republicans in celebrating a “cluster victory” and said, “The right to self-defense and to defend your family and loved ones should not end in your home.”

But Kishant Sewell, the New York City Police Commissioner, warned Gun Owners: “If you carry a gun illegally in New York City, you will be arrested. Nothing changes today.”

Transfer On’s Ebting mentioned, “It is hard to imagine a Supreme Court being further away from the people. Nine out of 10 Americans support public policies to reduce gun violence. This court … is now nothing more than the political arm of the party’s most extreme elements. Republican.”

Referring to McConnell’s unprecedented refusal to carry a listening to for Barack Obama’s third candidate — Merrick Garland, now legal professional normal — and the affirmation of three justices below Donald Trump, Ebting mentioned Republicans “stole the seats and packed this court to enact what voters repeatedly rejected at the ballot box.”

“It is time to expand and reform the court and restore balance to our judicial system.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.